HoopMetrics
TUEOCT27
  1. BKNNets0-3BOSCeltics2-1Model BOS 81%Preview →
  2. DETPistons3-0NYKKnicks0-3Model NYK 61%Preview →
  3. SACKings0-3SASSpurs1-2Model SAS 83%Preview →
  4. PORTrail Blazers2-0LALLakers3-0Model LAL 64%Preview →
  5. Full schedule

Detroit Pistons vs New York Knicks — prediction, odds and player props, Oct 27

DETAway · 3-0Detroit Pistons
TonightProj.DET 109.4 – 113.0 NYKMadison Square Garden
NYKHome · 0-3New York Knicks
DET 39%Win probability · model v1.261% NYK
Spread
NYK −3.6
Total
222.4
DET absences
−5.0
NYK absences
−1.1

Injury report

Official NBA report 11:45 AM ET
DET

Detroit Pistons

1 out · 2 other
NYK

New York Knicks

1 out

Absences in our model: DET −5.0 pts · NYK −1.1 ptsAll teams →

Model vs market

Odds read · sample 3 games
WinnerNYK 61%modelMarket NYK 64% at 1.57
SpreadNYK −3.6modelMarket NYK −6.5
Total222.4modelMarket 218.5
MarketPriceModelMarketEdgeVerdict
NYKMoneyline1.5760.4%63.7%−5.1%Pass
DET +2.5Spread2.0745.8%48.3%−5.2%Pass
Over 218.5Total1.9251.9%52.1%−0.4%Pass
Over 108.5Team total · DET1.9549.4%51.3%−3.6%Pass
Over 112.5Team total · NYK2.0547.1%48.8%−3.4%Pass
NYK1X2 · regulation1.6655.8%60.2%−7.3%Pass
NYK or drawDouble chance1.4559.9%69.0%−13.1%Pass

No value in the game lines: the model lands within the bookmaker's margin on every market. The best side of each market is shown.

Player props

Main lines · New York Knicks

Line → model projection
PlayerPtsRebAstPRA
Jalen BrunsonJalen Brunson25.5→23.53.5→3.45.5→5.934.5→34.7
Karl-Anthony TownsKarl-Anthony Towns19.5→20.711.5→13.13.5→3.234.5→38.8
OG AnunobyOG Anunoby16.5→16.55.5→5.81.5→2.723.5→26.5

Best edges · New York Knicks

All props tonight →

The model flags 3 of 354 prop lines in this game as value. Edges this wide come from a 3-game sample — treat them as leads, not locks.

Form & team stats

Detroit Pistons · last games

W@ PHI106–93Oct 25W@ MIA128–111Oct 23Wvs BOS121–113Oct 20

New York Knicks · last games

Lvs ORL102–111Oct 25L@ BOS103–107Oct 23Lvs PHI100–106Oct 20
DETPer game, this seasonNYK
118.3Points101.7
52.0Rebounds47.3
28.7Assists24.7
18.0Turnovers16.3
47.3FG%40.8
42.03P%32.4
77.9FT%70.8
+12.7Point diff.−6.3
All priced lines (354) — full line ladders per player
Mikal BridgesMikal BridgesG-F · NYK

FTA

U 1.5Pick
56% vs 53%1.87+6%
O 1.5
44% vs 56%1.78-22%

Pts

U 11.5
52% vs 53%1.90-1%
O 11.5
48% vs 55%1.82-13%

TO

U 1.5
68% vs 69%1.44-2%

Fouls

U 2.5
56% vs 58%1.71-3%
O 2.5
44% vs 50%2.00-13%

3PM

U 1.5
58% vs 61%1.65-4%
O 1.5
42% vs 47%2.12-12%

Pts + Reb

U 15.5
53% vs 56%1.80-4%
O 15.5
47% vs 52%1.92-11%

FTM

U 0.5
46% vs 48%2.07-4%
O 0.5
54% vs 61%1.65-11%

Pts + Ast

U 14.5
51% vs 53%1.87-4%
O 14.5
49% vs 54%1.85-10%

Ast

U 2.5
44% vs 49%2.05-9%
O 2.5
56% vs 58%1.71-5%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 18.5
54% vs 56%1.77-5%
O 18.5
46% vs 51%1.95-10%

Reb + Ast

U 6.5
52% vs 56%1.77-8%
O 6.5
48% vs 51%1.95-6%

2PA

U 5.5
52% vs 59%1.69-12%
O 5.5
48% vs 51%1.97-6%

3PA

U 4.5
55% vs 62%1.61-11%
O 4.5
45% vs 48%2.10-6%

Reb

U 3.5
51% vs 56%1.80-8%
O 3.5
49% vs 52%1.92-7%

FGA

U 9.5
48% vs 54%1.85-11%
O 9.5
52% vs 56%1.80-7%

2PM

U 2.5
42% vs 46%2.17-9%
O 2.5
58% vs 63%1.60-7%

FGM

U 4.5
52% vs 56%1.77-7%
O 4.5
48% vs 52%1.92-8%
Duncan RobinsonDuncan RobinsonF · DET

FTM

U 0.5
36% vs 48%2.10-25%
O 0.5Pick
64% vs 61%1.64+5%

FTA

U 1.5
43% vs 54%1.85-21%
O 1.5Pick
57% vs 56%1.80+3%

Pts + Ast

U 14.5
46% vs 55%1.83-16%
O 14.5
54% vs 53%1.88+2%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 16.5
43% vs 52%1.92-17%
O 16.5
57% vs 56%1.80+2%

Pts + Reb

U 14.5
44% vs 53%1.90-16%
O 14.5
56% vs 55%1.82+2%

3PA

U 7.5
51% vs 61%1.64-17%
O 7.5
49% vs 49%2.05+1%

Reb + Ast

U 4.5
51% vs 58%1.71-13%
O 4.5
49% vs 49%2.05+1%

3PM

U 2.5
38% vs 45%2.20-17%
O 2.5
62% vs 62%1.61+1%

Pts

U 12.5
47% vs 55%1.83-15%
O 12.5
53% vs 53%1.88+0%

Reb

U 2.5
54% vs 62%1.61-12%
O 2.5
46% vs 45%2.20+0%

FGA

U 9.5
47% vs 56%1.80-16%
O 9.5
53% vs 54%1.85-2%

Ast

U 1.5
39% vs 44%2.25-13%
O 1.5
61% vs 63%1.59-2%

FGM

U 3.5
39% vs 46%2.17-15%
O 3.5
61% vs 63%1.60-2%

Fouls

U 2.5
46% vs 52%1.92-11%
O 2.5
54% vs 56%1.77-5%

2PA

U 2.5
57% vs 65%1.55-11%
O 2.5
43% vs 45%2.22-5%

2PM

U 1.5
65% vs 68%1.46-6%

TO

O 0.5
67% vs 72%1.38-7%
Landry ShametLandry ShametG · NYK

FTA

U 0.5
48% vs 58%1.71-18%
O 0.5
52% vs 51%1.95+2%

3PM

U 1.5
53% vs 60%1.67-12%
O 1.5
47% vs 48%2.10-1%

FGM

U 2.5
53% vs 61%1.65-12%
O 2.5
47% vs 48%2.10-1%

3PA

U 4.5
52% vs 60%1.67-13%
O 4.5
48% vs 50%2.02-3%

2PA

U 1.5
52% vs 60%1.68-13%
O 1.5
48% vs 50%2.00-3%

TO

U 0.5
46% vs 52%1.92-12%
O 0.5
54% vs 56%1.78-4%

Fouls

U 2.5
64% vs 67%1.50-4%

FTM

U 0.5
54% vs 61%1.65-11%
O 0.5
46% vs 48%2.07-5%

Pts

U 6.5
46% vs 51%1.97-10%
O 6.5
54% vs 57%1.75-5%

FGA

U 5.5
44% vs 51%1.97-14%
O 5.5
56% vs 59%1.69-5%

2PM

U 0.5
44% vs 50%2.00-12%
O 0.5
56% vs 59%1.70-5%
Jalen BrunsonJalen BrunsonG · NYK

Fouls

U 2.5
54% vs 53%1.87+1%
O 2.5
46% vs 55%1.82-17%

FTM

U 5.5
52% vs 53%1.87-4%
O 5.5
48% vs 55%1.82-12%

2PM

U 6.5
51% vs 57%1.75-11%
O 6.5
49% vs 51%1.95-4%

Reb

U 3.5
56% vs 61%1.63-9%
O 3.5
44% vs 46%2.17-4%

TO

U 2.5
47% vs 50%2.02-4%
O 2.5
53% vs 59%1.69-11%

Pts

U 25.5
52% vs 55%1.83-5%
O 25.5
48% vs 53%1.88-10%

3PM

O 1.5
62% vs 65%1.53-5%

Reb + Ast

U 9.5
54% vs 59%1.69-8%
O 9.5
46% vs 48%2.07-6%

FGM

U 8.5
48% vs 54%1.85-10%
O 8.5
52% vs 55%1.83-6%

3PA

U 6.5
54% vs 61%1.63-11%
O 6.5
46% vs 48%2.07-6%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 34.5
50% vs 54%1.85-7%
O 34.5
50% vs 53%1.87-7%

Ast

U 5.5
46% vs 50%2.02-7%
O 5.5
54% vs 58%1.73-7%

FTA

U 6.5
50% vs 53%1.88-7%
O 6.5
50% vs 57%1.76-11%

Pts + Ast

U 31.5
51% vs 55%1.82-7%
O 31.5
49% vs 53%1.90-7%

Pts + Reb

U 28.5
49% vs 53%1.90-7%
O 28.5
51% vs 55%1.82-7%

2PA

U 13.5
48% vs 53%1.87-11%
O 13.5
52% vs 56%1.78-7%

FGA

U 19.5
46% vs 51%1.97-10%
O 19.5
54% vs 59%1.70-7%
Josh HartJosh HartG · NYK

FGM

U 4.5
54% vs 63%1.60-14%
O 4.5
46% vs 46%2.17+1%

Ast

U 4.5
55% vs 63%1.59-13%
O 4.5
45% vs 45%2.22-0%

Reb

U 7.5
51% vs 58%1.71-13%
O 7.5
49% vs 50%2.02-0%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 22.5
44% vs 51%1.95-15%
O 22.5
56% vs 56%1.77-0%

Pts + Reb

U 18.5
45% vs 53%1.90-14%
O 18.5
55% vs 55%1.82-0%

Reb + Ast

U 11.5
47% vs 54%1.85-13%
O 11.5
53% vs 53%1.87-1%

Pts + Ast

U 15.5
46% vs 53%1.87-13%
O 15.5
54% vs 54%1.85-1%

FGA

U 9.5
50% vs 60%1.67-16%
O 9.5
50% vs 50%2.00-1%

2PM

U 2.5
49% vs 57%1.76-14%
O 2.5
51% vs 52%1.92-1%

2PA

U 4.5
47% vs 56%1.80-15%
O 4.5
53% vs 54%1.85-2%

3PM

U 1.5
49% vs 55%1.82-11%
O 1.5
51% vs 53%1.90-2%

3PA

U 4.5
48% vs 56%1.80-14%
O 4.5
52% vs 54%1.85-3%

Pts

U 11.5
50% vs 56%1.80-11%
O 11.5
50% vs 52%1.92-3%

Fouls

U 3.5
58% vs 61%1.65-3%
O 3.5
42% vs 48%2.10-13%

FTM

U 1.5
55% vs 57%1.74-5%
O 1.5
45% vs 51%1.95-12%

TO

O 1.5
60% vs 65%1.54-7%

FTA

O 1.5
60% vs 68%1.47-11%
OG AnunobyOG AnunobyF-G · NYK

FTM

U 2.5
43% vs 51%1.95-17%
O 2.5
57% vs 57%1.75+1%

TO

U 1.5
51% vs 59%1.69-14%
O 1.5
49% vs 50%2.02-0%

FTA

U 3.5
47% vs 56%1.78-17%
O 3.5
53% vs 53%1.87-1%

Reb + Ast

U 7.5
51% vs 58%1.72-12%
O 7.5
49% vs 50%2.02-1%

Reb

U 5.5
54% vs 61%1.64-11%
O 5.5
46% vs 47%2.15-2%

Ast

O 1.5
63% vs 64%1.56-2%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 23.5
47% vs 53%1.88-12%
O 23.5
53% vs 55%1.83-3%

Pts + Ast

U 18.5
48% vs 54%1.85-11%
O 18.5
52% vs 53%1.87-3%

Pts + Reb

U 21.5
48% vs 53%1.88-11%
O 21.5
52% vs 55%1.83-4%

3PA

U 6.5
53% vs 60%1.67-12%
O 6.5
47% vs 50%2.02-5%

3PM

U 2.5
56% vs 60%1.68-6%
O 2.5
44% vs 48%2.07-9%

Pts

U 16.5
51% vs 55%1.82-8%
O 16.5
49% vs 53%1.90-6%

FGM

U 5.5
49% vs 54%1.85-9%
O 5.5
51% vs 55%1.83-7%

FGA

U 12.5
53% vs 59%1.70-10%
O 12.5
47% vs 51%1.97-7%

2PM

U 3.5
56% vs 61%1.65-8%
O 3.5
44% vs 48%2.07-8%

Fouls

U 3.5
61% vs 66%1.51-8%

2PA

U 5.5
48% vs 53%1.90-9%
O 5.5
52% vs 57%1.75-9%
John CollinsJohn CollinsF-C · DET

FTM

U 2.5
65% vs 65%1.55+1%

FGM

U 5.5
48% vs 56%1.80-14%
O 5.5
52% vs 53%1.90-1%

3PM

U 1.5
52% vs 59%1.70-12%
O 1.5
48% vs 49%2.05-1%

FTA

U 2.5
55% vs 56%1.80-1%
O 2.5
45% vs 54%1.85-17%

FGA

U 11.5
52% vs 60%1.67-14%
O 11.5
48% vs 50%2.02-2%

Pts + Reb

U 22.5
50% vs 56%1.78-11%
O 22.5
50% vs 51%1.95-3%

2PM

U 3.5
40% vs 46%2.17-14%
O 3.5
60% vs 63%1.60-3%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 23.5
48% vs 54%1.85-10%
O 23.5
52% vs 53%1.87-4%

Pts + Ast

U 16.5
49% vs 55%1.83-11%
O 16.5
51% vs 53%1.88-4%

2PA

U 6.5
42% vs 50%2.02-15%
O 6.5
58% vs 60%1.66-4%

Fouls

U 2.5
43% vs 45%2.22-4%
O 2.5
57% vs 63%1.58-10%

Pts

U 15.5
52% vs 57%1.76-9%
O 15.5
48% vs 51%1.97-4%

3PA

U 3.5
41% vs 47%2.12-13%
O 3.5
59% vs 63%1.60-6%

Reb

U 6.5
45% vs 49%2.05-9%
O 6.5
55% vs 59%1.70-6%

Reb + Ast

U 8.5
52% vs 57%1.76-8%
O 8.5
48% vs 51%1.97-6%

Ast

U 1.5
62% vs 66%1.51-6%

TO

U 1.5
53% vs 58%1.73-7%
O 1.5
47% vs 51%1.97-8%
Karl-Anthony TownsKarl-Anthony TownsC-F · NYK

FGM

U 6.5
50% vs 59%1.70-15%
O 6.5
50% vs 50%2.02+1%

TO

U 2.5
49% vs 58%1.73-15%
O 2.5
51% vs 51%1.97-0%

FGA

U 12.5
49% vs 58%1.72-16%
O 12.5
51% vs 51%1.95-1%

Pts + Reb

U 31.5
49% vs 56%1.80-12%
O 31.5
51% vs 52%1.92-1%

2PA

U 8.5
47% vs 56%1.78-15%
O 8.5
53% vs 53%1.87-2%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 34.5
47% vs 53%1.87-12%
O 34.5
53% vs 54%1.85-2%

2PM

U 4.5
41% vs 49%2.05-15%
O 4.5
59% vs 60%1.67-2%

3PA

U 3.5
47% vs 55%1.82-14%
O 3.5
53% vs 55%1.83-3%

Pts + Ast

U 22.5
47% vs 53%1.88-11%
O 22.5
53% vs 55%1.83-3%

3PM

U 1.5
54% vs 60%1.67-10%
O 1.5
46% vs 48%2.10-4%

Reb + Ast

U 15.5
51% vs 56%1.78-9%
O 15.5
49% vs 51%1.95-4%

Pts

U 19.5
50% vs 56%1.80-10%
O 19.5
50% vs 52%1.92-4%

Reb

U 11.5
46% vs 51%1.97-10%
O 11.5
54% vs 57%1.76-5%

FTA

U 5.5
49% vs 56%1.78-12%
O 5.5
51% vs 53%1.88-5%

FTM

U 4.5
48% vs 53%1.88-11%
O 4.5
52% vs 56%1.80-6%

Fouls

U 3.5
43% vs 46%2.17-6%
O 3.5
57% vs 63%1.60-9%

Ast

U 3.5
54% vs 58%1.72-6%
O 3.5
46% vs 50%2.02-8%
Miles McBrideMiles McBrideG · NYK

FGM

U 2.5
55% vs 64%1.56-14%
O 2.5
45% vs 44%2.25+0%

Fouls

U 1.5
52% vs 52%1.92-1%
O 1.5
48% vs 56%1.78-14%

2PA

U 1.5
49% vs 56%1.78-13%
O 1.5
51% vs 53%1.87-4%

FGA

U 5.5
46% vs 53%1.87-13%
O 5.5
54% vs 56%1.78-4%

3PA

U 3.5
41% vs 47%2.12-14%
O 3.5
59% vs 63%1.60-5%

2PM

U 0.5
48% vs 53%1.90-8%
O 0.5
52% vs 56%1.80-7%

FTM

U 0.5
60% vs 69%1.45-14%

FTA

U 0.5
56% vs 68%1.46-18%
Paul ReedPaul ReedF · DET

2PM

U 4.5
47% vs 53%1.90-11%
O 4.5
53% vs 56%1.80-4%

Ast

U 2.5
57% vs 63%1.59-9%
O 2.5
43% vs 44%2.25-4%

Pts + Ast

U 14.5
46% vs 51%1.97-9%
O 14.5
54% vs 56%1.77-5%

FGM

U 4.5
42% vs 48%2.07-13%
O 4.5
58% vs 61%1.65-5%

Pts + Reb

U 21.5
50% vs 56%1.80-9%
O 21.5
50% vs 52%1.92-5%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 23.5
49% vs 53%1.87-9%
O 23.5
51% vs 54%1.85-5%

FTA

U 2.5
55% vs 63%1.59-12%
O 2.5
45% vs 47%2.12-5%

Pts

U 12.5
49% vs 53%1.87-8%
O 12.5
51% vs 54%1.85-6%

3PA

U 0.5
43% vs 49%2.05-12%
O 0.5
57% vs 61%1.64-6%

Reb + Ast

U 10.5
47% vs 51%1.95-8%
O 10.5
53% vs 56%1.78-6%

Reb

U 8.5
50% vs 55%1.83-8%
O 8.5
50% vs 53%1.88-6%

FGA

U 8.5
46% vs 52%1.92-11%
O 8.5
54% vs 58%1.73-7%

TO

U 1.5
50% vs 55%1.83-9%
O 1.5
50% vs 54%1.85-7%

Fouls

U 3.5
58% vs 64%1.57-9%
O 3.5
42% vs 45%2.22-7%

2PA

U 7.5
45% vs 51%1.97-11%
O 7.5
55% vs 59%1.69-7%

FTM

U 1.5
49% vs 53%1.87-8%
O 1.5
51% vs 55%1.82-8%
Cade CunninghamCade CunninghamG · DET

Ast

U 9.5
53% vs 58%1.72-10%
O 9.5
47% vs 50%2.02-4%

Reb

U 5.5
53% vs 58%1.71-9%
O 5.5
47% vs 49%2.05-4%

FTA

U 5.5
47% vs 54%1.85-13%
O 5.5
53% vs 56%1.80-5%

2PM

U 6.5
55% vs 61%1.64-10%
O 6.5
45% vs 48%2.10-5%

Reb + Ast

U 14.5
49% vs 54%1.85-9%
O 14.5
51% vs 53%1.87-5%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 38.5
50% vs 55%1.83-9%
O 38.5
50% vs 53%1.90-5%

Pts + Ast

U 32.5
48% vs 53%1.90-9%
O 32.5
52% vs 55%1.82-5%

FTM

U 4.5
47% vs 53%1.87-11%
O 4.5
53% vs 56%1.80-5%

Pts + Reb

U 28.5
48% vs 52%1.92-8%
O 28.5
52% vs 56%1.80-6%

FGA

U 19.5
52% vs 55%1.82-6%
O 19.5
48% vs 55%1.83-11%

Pts

U 23.5
51% vs 54%1.85-6%
O 23.5
49% vs 53%1.87-8%

3PM

O 1.5
62% vs 66%1.52-6%

3PA

U 6.5
52% vs 56%1.78-7%
O 6.5
48% vs 53%1.87-11%

FGM

U 8.5
51% vs 56%1.78-9%
O 8.5
49% vs 53%1.90-7%

TO

U 4.5
52% vs 57%1.76-9%
O 4.5
48% vs 52%1.92-7%

2PA

U 12.5
48% vs 52%1.92-7%
O 12.5
52% vs 57%1.74-10%

Fouls

O 2.5
60% vs 66%1.52-8%
Ausar ThompsonAusar ThompsonG-F · DET

Fouls

U 3.5
63% vs 66%1.52-5%

Pts

U 9.5
51% vs 54%1.85-5%
O 9.5
49% vs 53%1.87-9%

Pts + Ast

U 13.5
51% vs 55%1.83-6%
O 13.5
49% vs 53%1.90-8%

Reb

U 5.5
46% vs 50%2.00-8%
O 5.5
54% vs 58%1.73-7%

Ast

U 3.5
48% vs 51%1.95-7%
O 3.5
52% vs 56%1.78-7%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 19.5
52% vs 56%1.80-7%
O 19.5
48% vs 52%1.92-7%

2PM

U 3.5
49% vs 53%1.87-9%
O 3.5
51% vs 55%1.82-7%

Pts + Reb

U 15.5
51% vs 55%1.82-7%
O 15.5
49% vs 53%1.90-7%

Reb + Ast

U 9.5
49% vs 53%1.90-7%
O 9.5
51% vs 55%1.82-7%

FGM

U 3.5
46% vs 51%1.97-9%
O 3.5
54% vs 58%1.72-7%

2PA

U 6.5
47% vs 52%1.92-10%
O 6.5
53% vs 57%1.74-7%

FGA

U 7.5
53% vs 58%1.71-10%
O 7.5
47% vs 51%1.95-8%

TO

U 1.5
45% vs 50%2.02-9%
O 1.5
55% vs 59%1.69-8%

FTM

U 1.5
59% vs 65%1.55-9%

FTA

U 2.5
61% vs 67%1.49-9%