Brooklyn Nets vs Boston Celtics — prediction, odds and player props, Oct 27

BKNAway · 0-3Brooklyn Nets
TonightProj.BKN 107.0 – 117.8 BOSTD Garden
BOSHome · 2-1Boston Celtics
BKN 19%Win probability · model v1.281% BOS
Spread
BOS −10.8
Total
224.8
BKN absences
−0.7
BOS absences
−0.0

Injury report

Official NBA report 12:45 PM ET
BKN

Brooklyn Nets

No injuries reported.

BOS

Boston Celtics

1 out

Absences in our model: BKN −0.7 ptsAll teams →

Model vs market

Odds read · sample 3 games
WinnerBOS 81%modelMarket BOS 88% at 1.14
SpreadBOS −10.8modelMarket BOS −14.5
Total224.8modelMarket 223.5
MarketPriceModelMarketEdgeVerdict
BKNMoneyline5.2018.4%19.2%−4.3%Pass
BKN +11.5Spread2.0048.7%50.0%−2.6%Pass
Over 223.5Total1.9250.3%52.1%−3.5%Pass
Over 106.5Team total · BKN2.0048.2%50.0%−3.6%Pass
Under 118.5Team total · BOS1.8750.8%53.5%−5.0%Pass
BKN1X2 · regulation5.3517.5%18.7%−6.3%Pass
BKN or drawDouble chance4.0022.2%25.0%−11.2%Pass

No value in the game lines: the model lands within the bookmaker's margin on every market. The best side of each market is shown.

Player props

Main lines · Brooklyn Nets

Line → model projection
PlayerPtsRebAstPRA
Michael Porter Jr.Michael Porter Jr.22.5→19.35.5→5.71.5→1.930.5→28.2
Julius RandleJulius Randle19.5→18.96.5→6.44.5→5.130.5→31.7
Egor DëminEgor Dëmin10.5→9.42.5→3.03.5→3.216.5→16.1

Best edges · Brooklyn Nets

All props tonight →

The model flags 2 of 357 prop lines in this game as value. Edges this wide come from a 3-game sample — treat them as leads, not locks.

Form & team stats

BKNPer game, this seasonBOS
111.0Points118.0
42.0Rebounds43.3
23.3Assists26.3
18.7Turnovers16.7
41.7FG%47.0
37.83P%42.4
76.4FT%74.2
−12.7Point diff.+10.3
All priced lines (357) — full line ladders per player
Noah ClowneyNoah ClowneyF-C · BKN

FTM

U 1.5
51% vs 62%1.62-18%
O 1.5Pick
49% vs 47%2.12+4%

FTA

U 1.5
40% vs 51%1.97-21%
O 1.5
60% vs 58%1.71+3%

FGA

U 5.5
52% vs 61%1.63-16%
O 5.5
48% vs 48%2.07-0%

Fouls

U 1.5
45% vs 53%1.88-16%
O 1.5
55% vs 56%1.80-0%

2PA

U 1.5
42% vs 51%1.97-17%
O 1.5
58% vs 59%1.69-2%

Pts + Reb

U 10.5
47% vs 53%1.90-11%
O 10.5
53% vs 55%1.82-3%

Pts

U 7.5
51% vs 57%1.76-11%
O 7.5
49% vs 51%1.97-3%

3PA

U 3.5
53% vs 61%1.64-13%
O 3.5
47% vs 49%2.05-4%

2PM

U 0.5
40% vs 45%2.20-13%
O 0.5
60% vs 63%1.59-4%

FGM

U 1.5
39% vs 44%2.25-13%
O 1.5
61% vs 64%1.56-4%

TO

U 0.5
43% vs 49%2.05-12%
O 0.5
57% vs 60%1.67-5%

Reb

U 3.5
53% vs 58%1.72-8%
O 3.5
47% vs 50%2.02-6%

3PM

U 1.5
61% vs 66%1.51-7%

Fouls

U 1.5Pick
46% vs 44%2.25+4%
O 1.5
54% vs 64%1.56-16%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 24.5
54% vs 53%1.90+3%
O 24.5
46% vs 55%1.82-17%

Pts + Ast

U 20.5
53% vs 52%1.92+3%
O 20.5
47% vs 56%1.80-16%

FTM

U 2.5
66% vs 65%1.54+2%

FTA

U 2.5
63% vs 62%1.61+2%
O 2.5
37% vs 48%2.10-23%

Pts + Reb

U 19.5
56% vs 55%1.82+1%
O 19.5
44% vs 53%1.90-16%

FGA

U 12.5
53% vs 53%1.88+0%
O 12.5
47% vs 56%1.77-17%

3PM

U 2.5
55% vs 55%1.83+0%
O 2.5
45% vs 53%1.88-15%

3PA

U 7.5
56% vs 56%1.80+0%
O 7.5
44% vs 54%1.85-18%

Pts

U 15.5
54% vs 55%1.83-1%
O 15.5
46% vs 53%1.88-14%

FGM

U 5.5
55% vs 56%1.78-2%
O 5.5
45% vs 53%1.90-15%

2PM

U 2.5
49% vs 50%2.00-2%
O 2.5
51% vs 58%1.71-13%

Reb + Ast

U 9.5
56% vs 57%1.74-3%
O 9.5
44% vs 50%2.00-12%

Ast

U 5.5
55% vs 57%1.76-3%
O 5.5
45% vs 51%1.97-11%

TO

U 2.5
61% vs 64%1.56-4%
O 2.5
39% vs 44%2.25-13%

Reb

U 3.5
48% vs 51%1.97-4%
O 3.5
52% vs 56%1.77-9%

2PA

U 5.5
58% vs 62%1.62-6%
O 5.5
42% vs 48%2.07-14%

FTA

U 1.5
58% vs 56%1.78+3%
O 1.5
42% vs 53%1.87-21%

Fouls

U 1.5
45% vs 53%1.88-15%
O 1.5
55% vs 56%1.80-2%

FGA

U 7.5
51% vs 60%1.68-14%
O 7.5
49% vs 50%2.00-2%

2PA

U 2.5
38% vs 45%2.22-16%
O 2.5
62% vs 65%1.54-4%

FTM

U 0.5
50% vs 52%1.92-4%
O 0.5
50% vs 57%1.76-12%

2PM

U 1.5
62% vs 65%1.53-5%

3PA

U 3.5
42% vs 48%2.10-12%
O 3.5
58% vs 62%1.61-6%

FGM

U 2.5
51% vs 56%1.78-9%
O 2.5
49% vs 53%1.90-7%

TO

U 1.5
60% vs 66%1.51-10%
Egor DëminEgor DëminG · BKN

FTM

U 0.5
43% vs 53%1.90-19%
O 0.5
57% vs 56%1.78+2%

FTA

U 0.5
41% vs 51%1.95-21%
O 0.5
60% vs 58%1.71+2%

Pts

U 10.5
53% vs 55%1.82-4%
O 10.5
47% vs 53%1.90-10%

3PM

U 1.5
40% vs 44%2.25-10%
O 1.5
60% vs 63%1.59-4%

Fouls

U 1.5
42% vs 47%2.12-11%
O 1.5
58% vs 61%1.63-5%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 16.5
49% vs 52%1.92-5%
O 16.5
51% vs 56%1.80-9%

Pts + Reb

U 13.5
51% vs 53%1.87-5%
O 13.5
49% vs 54%1.85-9%

Pts + Ast

U 13.5
50% vs 53%1.90-6%
O 13.5
50% vs 55%1.82-8%

Reb + Ast

U 6.5
53% vs 57%1.76-7%
O 6.5
47% vs 51%1.97-8%

Ast

U 3.5
56% vs 60%1.66-7%
O 3.5
44% vs 48%2.10-7%

TO

U 1.5
45% vs 50%2.02-9%
O 1.5
55% vs 59%1.69-7%

Reb

O 2.5
59% vs 64%1.56-8%

2PA

U 2.5
55% vs 62%1.62-10%
O 2.5
45% vs 48%2.07-8%

FGM

U 3.5
57% vs 62%1.61-8%
O 3.5
43% vs 47%2.15-8%

3PA

U 5.5
43% vs 48%2.07-10%
O 5.5
57% vs 61%1.63-8%

FGA

U 8.5
51% vs 57%1.76-10%
O 8.5
49% vs 53%1.88-8%

2PM

O 0.5
63% vs 69%1.44-10%
Julius RandleJulius RandleF-C · BKN

TO

U 3.5
53% vs 52%1.92+1%
O 3.5
47% vs 57%1.76-16%

Fouls

U 2.5
48% vs 49%2.05-1%
O 2.5
52% vs 60%1.67-14%

3PA

U 4.5
55% vs 57%1.75-4%
O 4.5
45% vs 53%1.90-14%

FGA

U 14.5
49% vs 51%1.95-5%
O 14.5
51% vs 58%1.72-12%

Pts + Ast

U 24.5
51% vs 56%1.78-9%
O 24.5
49% vs 51%1.95-5%

Pts + Reb

U 25.5
49% vs 54%1.85-8%
O 25.5
51% vs 53%1.88-5%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 30.5
49% vs 53%1.87-9%
O 30.5
51% vs 54%1.85-5%

Reb

U 6.5
52% vs 56%1.77-7%
O 6.5
48% vs 51%1.97-6%

Reb + Ast

U 11.5
50% vs 54%1.85-7%
O 11.5
50% vs 53%1.87-7%

Pts

U 19.5
52% vs 56%1.78-7%
O 19.5
48% vs 51%1.95-7%

Ast

U 4.5
43% vs 46%2.17-8%
O 4.5
57% vs 62%1.62-7%

2PM

U 5.5
55% vs 61%1.65-9%
O 5.5
45% vs 48%2.07-7%

2PA

U 10.5
54% vs 58%1.72-7%
O 10.5
46% vs 51%1.95-10%

3PM

U 1.5
60% vs 65%1.55-7%

FTM

U 5.5
53% vs 58%1.72-9%
O 5.5
47% vs 51%1.97-8%

FGM

U 6.5
48% vs 52%1.92-8%
O 6.5
52% vs 56%1.78-8%

FTA

U 6.5
47% vs 51%1.97-8%
O 6.5
53% vs 58%1.71-9%
Jayson TatumJayson TatumF-G · BOS

Pts + Ast

U 33.5
53% vs 53%1.90+1%
O 33.5
47% vs 55%1.82-15%

TO

U 3.5
63% vs 63%1.59+0%
O 3.5
37% vs 45%2.20-19%

FGM

U 9.5
52% vs 52%1.92+0%
O 9.5
48% vs 57%1.76-16%

2PM

U 6.5
53% vs 53%1.90-0%
O 6.5
47% vs 56%1.80-15%

Fouls

U 2.5
53% vs 53%1.88-0%
O 2.5
47% vs 56%1.80-16%

FTM

U 5.5
57% vs 57%1.75-0%
O 5.5
43% vs 51%1.95-16%

FTA

U 6.5
57% vs 57%1.74-1%
O 6.5
43% vs 52%1.92-17%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 42.5
55% vs 56%1.80-1%
O 42.5
45% vs 52%1.92-13%

Pts + Reb

U 35.5
54% vs 56%1.80-2%
O 35.5
46% vs 52%1.92-13%

Pts

U 26.5
52% vs 53%1.88-3%
O 26.5
48% vs 55%1.83-12%

Ast

U 6.5
48% vs 50%2.02-3%
O 6.5
52% vs 58%1.72-11%

FGA

U 20.5
50% vs 51%1.95-3%
O 20.5
50% vs 58%1.72-13%

2PA

U 12.5
56% vs 58%1.71-4%
O 12.5
44% vs 51%1.95-14%

Reb

U 8.5
52% vs 57%1.74-9%
O 8.5
48% vs 50%2.00-5%

Reb + Ast

U 15.5
53% vs 56%1.77-7%
O 15.5
47% vs 51%1.95-8%

3PA

U 8.5
50% vs 53%1.87-7%
O 8.5
50% vs 56%1.78-11%

3PM

O 2.5
56% vs 65%1.55-13%

TO

U 1.5
56% vs 56%1.78-0%
O 1.5
44% vs 53%1.90-17%

2PM

U 3.5
60% vs 61%1.65-1%
O 3.5
40% vs 48%2.07-18%

3PA

U 6.5
48% vs 48%2.07-1%
O 6.5
52% vs 61%1.63-15%

Ast

U 4.5
52% vs 53%1.90-1%
O 4.5
48% vs 55%1.83-12%

Fouls

U 1.5
53% vs 53%1.87-1%
O 1.5
47% vs 56%1.80-15%

FGA

U 12.5
53% vs 54%1.85-2%
O 12.5
47% vs 56%1.80-16%

Reb + Ast

U 7.5
52% vs 53%1.90-2%
O 7.5
48% vs 55%1.82-12%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 23.5
52% vs 53%1.88-2%
O 23.5
48% vs 55%1.83-13%

Pts + Ast

U 20.5
53% vs 55%1.83-3%
O 20.5
47% vs 53%1.88-12%

FGM

U 6.5
60% vs 62%1.62-3%
O 6.5
40% vs 47%2.15-14%

Pts + Reb

U 18.5
50% vs 52%1.92-3%
O 18.5
50% vs 56%1.80-11%

3PM

U 2.5
50% vs 53%1.90-5%
O 2.5
50% vs 55%1.82-9%

Reb

U 2.5
43% vs 45%2.20-5%
O 2.5
57% vs 63%1.60-9%

2PA

U 5.5
54% vs 57%1.76-6%
O 5.5
46% vs 53%1.90-12%

FTA

U 1.5
43% vs 49%2.05-11%
O 1.5
57% vs 61%1.65-6%

Pts

U 15.5
49% vs 53%1.90-6%
O 15.5
51% vs 55%1.82-8%

FTM

U 1.5
50% vs 55%1.83-9%
O 1.5
50% vs 54%1.85-7%
Keon EllisKeon EllisG · BKN

2PM

U 0.5
41% vs 49%2.05-17%
O 0.5
59% vs 60%1.67-1%

2PA

U 1.5
47% vs 56%1.78-16%
O 1.5
53% vs 53%1.87-1%

FGA

U 4.5
44% vs 52%1.92-16%
O 4.5
56% vs 57%1.74-2%

FGM

O 1.5
63% vs 65%1.55-3%

Pts + Ast

U 8.5
48% vs 53%1.90-10%
O 8.5
52% vs 55%1.83-4%

Pts

U 6.5
48% vs 53%1.90-10%
O 6.5
52% vs 55%1.82-4%

Ast

U 1.5
44% vs 47%2.12-6%
O 1.5
56% vs 61%1.65-8%

Fouls

U 1.5
41% vs 45%2.22-9%
O 1.5
59% vs 63%1.58-7%

TO

U 0.5
47% vs 51%1.95-9%
O 0.5
53% vs 57%1.75-7%

3PM

U 1.5
61% vs 68%1.48-9%

FTM

U 0.5
62% vs 68%1.46-10%

3PA

U 3.5
56% vs 65%1.53-14%

FTA

U 0.5
57% vs 67%1.49-15%
Paul GeorgePaul GeorgeF · BOS

TO

U 2.5
56% vs 57%1.76-1%
O 2.5
44% vs 52%1.92-16%

2PM

U 3.5
51% vs 52%1.92-3%
O 3.5
49% vs 56%1.77-13%

Reb

U 4.5
50% vs 56%1.78-11%
O 4.5
50% vs 51%1.95-3%

FTA

U 2.5
49% vs 58%1.73-15%
O 2.5
51% vs 52%1.92-3%

FTM

U 2.5
57% vs 63%1.58-11%
O 2.5
43% vs 45%2.22-4%

Pts

U 18.5
50% vs 56%1.80-10%
O 18.5
50% vs 52%1.92-4%

Reb + Ast

U 7.5
49% vs 55%1.83-10%
O 7.5
51% vs 53%1.88-4%

FGM

U 6.5
47% vs 50%2.02-5%
O 6.5
53% vs 59%1.69-11%

Pts + Reb

U 22.5
48% vs 53%1.90-8%
O 22.5
52% vs 55%1.82-6%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 25.5
48% vs 52%1.92-8%
O 25.5
52% vs 56%1.80-6%

3PM

U 2.5
42% vs 45%2.22-8%
O 2.5
58% vs 63%1.60-6%

Pts + Ast

U 21.5
50% vs 54%1.85-7%
O 21.5
50% vs 53%1.87-7%

Ast

O 2.5
59% vs 64%1.57-7%

Fouls

U 2.5
47% vs 51%1.95-9%
O 2.5
53% vs 57%1.74-8%

3PA

U 7.5
53% vs 57%1.74-8%
O 7.5
47% vs 52%1.92-10%

FGA

U 14.5
52% vs 56%1.78-8%
O 14.5
48% vs 53%1.87-9%

2PA

U 6.5
46% vs 51%1.97-10%
O 6.5
54% vs 59%1.69-9%

FTM

U 3.5
55% vs 56%1.78-1%
O 3.5
45% vs 52%1.92-14%

Pts

U 22.5
54% vs 55%1.82-2%
O 22.5
46% vs 53%1.90-12%

2PM

U 4.5
56% vs 63%1.59-11%
O 4.5
44% vs 45%2.20-4%

FTA

U 3.5
47% vs 49%2.05-4%
O 3.5
53% vs 61%1.65-12%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 30.5
53% vs 56%1.80-5%
O 30.5
47% vs 52%1.92-10%

Pts + Reb

U 28.5
53% vs 56%1.80-5%
O 28.5
47% vs 52%1.92-10%

Pts + Ast

U 24.5
53% vs 56%1.80-5%
O 24.5
47% vs 52%1.92-10%

TO

U 2.5
62% vs 65%1.53-5%

3PM

U 2.5
42% vs 44%2.25-5%
O 2.5
58% vs 63%1.58-9%

Fouls

U 2.5
56% vs 59%1.69-6%
O 2.5
44% vs 50%2.02-10%

Ast

U 1.5
41% vs 45%2.22-8%
O 1.5
59% vs 63%1.60-6%

Reb + Ast

U 7.5
47% vs 51%1.97-7%
O 7.5
53% vs 57%1.75-8%

FGM

U 7.5
54% vs 60%1.68-10%
O 7.5
46% vs 50%2.02-7%

Reb

U 5.5
47% vs 51%1.97-7%
O 5.5
53% vs 57%1.75-8%

FGA

U 16.5
52% vs 56%1.77-8%
O 16.5
48% vs 53%1.88-10%

3PA

U 8.5
54% vs 59%1.69-8%
O 8.5
46% vs 51%1.97-10%

2PA

U 7.5
45% vs 49%2.05-9%
O 7.5
55% vs 61%1.65-9%

2PA

U 3.5
46% vs 47%2.15-2%
O 3.5
54% vs 63%1.58-14%

2PM

U 2.5
49% vs 50%2.00-2%
O 2.5
51% vs 58%1.71-13%

FGM

U 2.5
47% vs 50%2.02-4%
O 2.5
53% vs 59%1.70-11%

FGA

U 4.5
60% vs 63%1.59-4%
O 4.5
40% vs 47%2.12-16%

Pts

U 6.5
56% vs 59%1.69-5%
O 6.5
44% vs 48%2.07-9%

FTA

U 1.5
51% vs 55%1.83-6%
O 1.5
49% vs 55%1.82-11%

Fouls

U 2.5
53% vs 57%1.76-8%
O 2.5
47% vs 52%1.92-9%

FTM

U 0.5
60% vs 65%1.53-9%

TO

O 0.5
59% vs 67%1.50-11%

Reb + Ast

U 10.5
50% vs 51%1.97-2%
O 10.5
50% vs 57%1.75-12%

Reb

U 7.5
46% vs 47%2.12-2%
O 7.5
54% vs 60%1.66-11%

Pts + Reb + Ast

U 20.5
51% vs 53%1.90-2%
O 20.5
49% vs 55%1.82-12%

Pts + Reb

U 17.5
49% vs 51%1.97-3%
O 17.5
51% vs 56%1.77-10%

Pts

U 9.5
50% vs 51%1.95-3%
O 9.5
50% vs 56%1.78-10%

Ast

U 2.5
49% vs 51%1.95-4%
O 2.5
51% vs 56%1.77-10%

Pts + Ast

U 12.5
52% vs 54%1.85-4%
O 12.5
48% vs 53%1.87-10%

FTA

O 1.5
65% vs 68%1.46-5%

FGA

U 6.5
47% vs 50%2.02-5%
O 6.5
53% vs 60%1.66-12%

Fouls

U 2.5
48% vs 53%1.87-10%
O 2.5
52% vs 55%1.82-5%

2PA

U 5.5
46% vs 48%2.07-6%
O 5.5
54% vs 61%1.64-11%

TO

U 1.5
44% vs 49%2.05-10%
O 1.5
56% vs 60%1.67-6%

FTM

U 1.5
53% vs 58%1.72-10%
O 1.5
47% vs 51%1.97-6%

3PA

U 0.5
43% vs 46%2.17-7%
O 0.5
57% vs 64%1.57-11%

2PM

U 3.5
55% vs 59%1.69-7%
O 3.5
45% vs 50%2.02-9%

FGM

U 3.5
49% vs 53%1.88-9%
O 3.5
51% vs 56%1.80-7%
Jordan WalshJordan WalshG · BOS

Fouls

U 2.5
61% vs 63%1.60-2%
O 2.5
39% vs 46%2.17-15%

Pts

U 4.5
49% vs 55%1.82-10%
O 4.5
51% vs 53%1.90-4%

3PA

U 2.5
63% vs 66%1.51-4%

Pts + Reb

U 8.5
51% vs 56%1.80-9%
O 8.5
49% vs 52%1.92-5%

Reb

U 3.5
45% vs 50%2.02-9%
O 3.5
55% vs 58%1.72-5%

2PM

U 1.5
61% vs 65%1.55-6%

TO

U 0.5
46% vs 50%2.00-8%
O 0.5
54% vs 58%1.71-7%

FGA

U 4.5
54% vs 58%1.73-7%
O 4.5
47% vs 52%1.92-11%

FTA

U 0.5
60% vs 66%1.52-9%

FGM

O 1.5
60% vs 67%1.50-9%

2PA

U 2.5
59% vs 66%1.52-11%